The biggest surprised is the fact that company produced lending based solely on the applicant's sexual orientation. I actually love that a company is able to stand behind something they firmly believe in and be profitable. We've become so sensitive to discrimination that we're losing that ability to be free and make secluded decisions.
2) Identify at least one part of the reading that was confusing to you.
I didn't find anything really confusing and really enjoyed this explanation around micro financing.
3) If you were able to ask two questions to the author, what would you ask? Why?
How do you propose a business like this that's targeting gender affiliation deal with issues like trans identity?
4) Was there anything you think the author was wrong about? Where do you disagree with what she or he said? How?
No there wasn't anything I disagreed with.
No comments:
Post a Comment